An article from the GSC Team about closing security gaps
October 18 2007 | 0 comment(s)
by Janeen Chupa and Simon Schneider
It
started out simply enough - two graduate students with some free time
and a desire to do good. What we ended up learning was a pretty
substantial lesson; that European governments need to change their
thinking when looking for innovation in security technologies to
protect our airports, cities and borders.
Evolving Threats
Everyone
understands that technologically the threat is diverging, becoming both
more simplistic (eg roadside IEDs) and more technologically advanced
(eg cyberattacks). And while a technological response is not a panacea
it can help. In recent years, many of the gaps have been shared with
the public as NATO, EU and even MI5 complained about the evolving
technological advances of the threats they face.
Last November, the Director General of MI5, Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, illustrated these advancing threats in a speech, stating "today
we see the use of home-made improvised explosive devices; tomorrow's
threat may include the use of chemicals, bacteriological agents,
radioactive materials and even nuclear technology."
While
governments aim to involve the private sector in the creation of
advanced security technologies, entrepreneurs, often the truest
innovators, are left aside. Not only is it a challenge to find security
startups in Europe, the ones we met complain about large hurdles as
they try to sell to government entities with long procurement cycles
causing cash flow problems. They also face not having access to venture
capital, especially in Europe, which hurts even more as they have to
put in much more time and money in research than a web 2.0 startup.
So it seemed to us and everyone else that finding the developers and giving them money for research should solve the problem.
The
European governments seemed to agree with that analysis as they
earmarked large funds for security research. The German government
announced it will spend additional €123 million on research in the
coming years. While the EU also just allocated €1.4 billion funding for
security research in technology solutions for civil protection,
bio-security, protection against crime and terrorism in its EU
Framework 7.
We originally thought that finding these
technologies would be the hard part and if we could bring together the
truly innovative with those who support such work, then these
technologies would make it to market. So one year ago we initiated a
business plan competition called the Global Security Challenge to bring attention to the best technologies by bringing together the innovators, venture capitalists and customers.
We
assumed the disconnect would lie between scientists and policy makers
and that finding the right innovators to fund would prove to be quite a
challenge. It does take a lot of work and grass-root efforts, but they
can be found.
Innovation Gaps
The
actual problem is that there is a missing step between researching and
implementing technological innovation. Infant ventures need as much
focus and nurturing as researchers and yet there is a dearth of
support. As business students we were stunned that market measures that
typically bring about necessary advancements were not being used in
homeland security market. This isn't what we learned in the classroom,
in particular when there was so much money to be made.
So what
we've come to believe is that supporting entrepreneurs should play a
critical role in any security technology policy, particularly as we see
the scope of threats increasing.
The
US has taken the first step in the right direction by creating a
dedicated incubator for security technologies through the help of the
NSA. In Europe there have been many calls by security leaders for a
similar type of organization. Tom Enders, the former CEO of EADS acknowledges this gap when he said in speech at the European Defence Agency last year that, "We need a technology incubator to generate breakthrough approaches."
Innovation
is going to come from the entrepreneurs and no one can afford to wait
for good ideas to make it through the maze that is the current European
homeland security market - if they make it at all. Which leaves the
question, how will Europe nurture its innovators?
Previous articles
July 2008 - 14 article(s) | show
June 2008 - 21 article(s) | show
May 2008 - 20 article(s) | show
April 2008 - 12 article(s) | show
March 2008 - 7 article(s) | show
February 2008 - 8 article(s) | show
January 2008 - 9 article(s) | show
December 2007 - 1 article(s) | show
November 2007 - 8 article(s) | show
October 2007 - 11 article(s) | show
September 2007 - 6 article(s) | show
Leave a Comment